<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/39">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sand Creek Massacre Unit Plan]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This unit fits within the context of the Civil War and Westward Expansion/Indian Removal. It is intended to be used as a complete unit, as the lessons require an understanding of the Sand Creek Massacre. However, if pressed for time, the Background Information Sheet can be substituted for Lesson 1. <br />
On November 29, 1864, a group of approximately 675 Colorado cavalrymen led by Col. John Chivington attacked an encampment of approximately 800-900 Cheyenne and Arapaho people, many of whom were women and children, and unarmed. This massacre, as students will learn, is directly related to the Civil War, and as such this unit can fit within a larger unit on the Civil War. Moreover, through this unit, students will gain some perspective about Westward Expansion as seen through the eyes of the Cheyenne and Arapaho people. This unit will use the Sand Creek Massacre to develop understandings of how historians deal with conflicting narratives to create stories. By analyzing the conflicting accounts of the Sand Creek Massacre, students will learn how to interrogate sources, their authors, and their biases. In addition to these historical thinking skills, this unit provides an opportunity to understand the concept of historical memory and the role of national monuments. As the Sand Creek Massacre has largely been written out of most textbooks, this unit encourages students to think about the importance of remembering events.<br />
We remember the Civil War as a war of liberation that freed four million slaves,” historian Ari Kelman says. “But it also became a war of conquest to destroy and dispossess Native Americans.” Sand Creek, he adds, “is a bloody and mostly forgotten link” between the Civil War and the Plains Indian Wars that continued for 25 years after Appomattox. The massacre at Sand Creek accomplished the opposite of what Chivington and his allies had sought, as it united formerly divided tribes into a formidable obstacle to expansion rather than speed the removal of Indians and opening of the Plains to white settlers.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ben Binversie]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1864-11-29]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/40">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sand Creek Massacre Lesson 1]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This lesson will situate the Sand Creek Massacre within the broader context of Native American history and the Civil War. This lesson will describe important events and treaties leading up to the Sand Creek Massacre. By showing how the Civil War and Sand Creek Massacre are not simply simultaneous events, but part of an intertwined process of westward expansion, this lesson will demonstrate how Native American history is U.S. history, and students will be able to understand the context and importance of the following lesson plans on the Massacre and its consequences for U.S.- Indian relations. As historian Ari Kelman says, &quot;We remember the Civil War as a war of liberation that freed four million slaves. But it also became a war of conquest to destroy and dispossess Native Americans.” Sand Creek, he adds, “is a bloody and mostly forgotten link” between the Civil War and the Plains Indian Wars that continued for 25 years after Appomattox.&quot; Included in this lesson are the Fort Laramie (link to the digital copy in Lesson Sources) and Fort Wise treaties, which can be used for analysis if students and teacher are already familiar with treaties. However, they are not essential to this lesson plan, but are included for your convenience. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ben Binversie]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1851/1861]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/41">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sand Creek Massacre Lesson 1 Presentation]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Presentation for Lesson 1<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ben Binversie]]></dcterms:creator>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/42">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sand Creek Massacre Lesson 1 Worksheet]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Worksheet to accompany Lesson 1]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ben Binversie]]></dcterms:creator>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/44">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sand Creek Massacre Lesson 2]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This lesson will explore various accounts of the Sand Creek Massacre and enable students to compare conflicting accounts to develop an understanding of what happened at Sand Creek. After reading the first account of the massacre by John Chivington, the students will form groups and analyze other accounts about Sand Creek and compare them critically. It is best to complete Lesson 1: Sand Creek Background beforehand, but if need be, the background information sheet can be used to supplant Lesson 1. This lesson is planned as a 2-day lesson. Look at this lesson in conjunction with lesson 3 to determine if they would fit better together or as separate lessons, depending on the familiarity of your class with primary source analysis and the concept of bias.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ben Binversie]]></dcterms:creator>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/45">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sand Creek Massacre Lesson 2 Worksheet]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Worksheet to accompany Lesson 2<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ben Binversie]]></dcterms:creator>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/52">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Little Arkansas Treaty]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treaty of October 1865, accompanying Lesson 4]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Charles J. Kappler]]></dcterms:creator>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/43">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Fort Wise Treaty]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Text of the Fort Wise Treaty for Lesson 1]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[National Archives]]></dcterms:creator>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/30">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Native American Code Talkers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This unit is intended to work within the framework of World War II and help rework the master narrative that Native American communities disappeared after Westward Expansion. The final lesson plan, in particular, focuses connecting past injustices that the U.S. government committed against Native American tribes and connecting that to present day plights that many of these tribes still face today.  <br />
<br />
The United States is often remembered as a vital player in helping win WWII, but what is so often left out of the narrative is the crucial role that Native Americans played. The misremembrance of the war plays into the idea that Native Americans disappeared and were completely separate from larger American society. This unit seeks to rectify this larger miscommunication and as such should be incorporated into the teacher&#039;s larger unit on WWII. While the mini unit does touch on Native American soldiers, the main focus rests on Native code talkers, who helped code American messages that were unbreakable to enemy powers. At a time when coding and decoding messages was the difference between winning or losing battles, students will get a sense of how important these tribes were in winning the war.  <br />
<br />
In addition to simply discussing code talkers, throughout the unit students are asked to analyze a variety of primary and secondary sources to identify biases. The goal is to use these sources to help students build their own narrative of who the code talkers were, how they are remembered today, and the dangers of blindly trusting sources without interrogating their bias.  ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ruth Isaac]]></dcterms:creator>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://native-history.sites.grinnell.edu/items/show/31">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Lesson 1: Introduction to Native American Involvement in WWII]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This lesson plan is meant to expose students to how Native Americans contributed to WWII and how that contribution is remembered today. While this lesson plan looks specifically at Native American code talkers, the more traditional war roles (i.e. soldiers) that Native Americans had are not delved into here. Students are asked to analyze sources from standardized textbooks, a New York Times article, and Native American testimonies. By comparing various sources, this unit demonstrates that Native American code talkers are seldom recognized for their vital contributions to WWII. Due to the volume of sources, if you run out of time, you can save the Native American testimonials for Lesson 2.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ruth Isaac]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1941-12-07/1945-09-02]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
